This can be an advantage because inserts can be a bit fiddly to use, and can be quite warm if the weather is hot.įrom my brief experience with the Lillebaby to date, I would suggest that not all babies would be happy to be in the legs out position from birth, and Lillebaby does provide instructions for keeping a newborn in the legs in position, in the event they are not happy to have their legs out of the carrier. The Lillebaby’s narrowest seat position is narrower than the 360, so while in a 360 a small baby would still need to be in the insert, they would likely be able to sit without an insert in the Lillebaby. The extra position the Lillebaby offers is legs out for a baby over 3.1kg who is happy to sit in the legs out position. The Ergo 360 is comfortable for small framed people and can fit an 18 month old comfortably. It markets itself as a six-position carrier (newborn legs in, infant legs out, forward facing, toddler legs out, hip and back). The Lillebaby I have used in this review is called the All Seasons Complete. Two of the most popular on the market right now are the Ergo 360 and the Lillebaby. So to meet this demand, while addressing the issues of ergonomic positioning, new carriers have been developed that have a forward facing position that provides a more ergonomic seat for baby. Their child enjoys the stimulation, or they catch public transport and enjoy being able to sit down with baby on their lap securely, for example. But, for some parents, forward facing is something they’d like to be able to do. I also feel there is a potential for forward facing to lead to an overstimulated baby, who has nowhere to turn away from the busy world if feeling overwhelmed. On the front facing me, or back carrying, or on the hip in a ring sling, gave me enough flexibility to get on with my day. Now, for me personally, carrying my baby in a forward facing position wasn’t something I needed or wanted to do. But the ascendancy of ergonomic carriers meant the death of forward facing babywearing, as an ergonomic position meant a wide base too wide for the child to sit forward facing. The traditional narrow based carrier (or front pack carrier) like the Baby Bjorn has gone out of fashion, as it does not provide a particularly ergonomic position for baby, or for the wearer. With the growth of babywearing worldwide, the ergonomics of carrying a baby has become more and more important. The original Baby Bjorn was designed to allow a baby to be carried in a forward facing position. Where once pretty much the only baby carrier you could buy was a Baby Bjorn, there are now a pile of different baby carriers on the market. As the practice of babywearing has rapidly grown and developed, particularly over the last 10 years, baby carrier designers have continued to add functionality and appeal to their carriers in an attempt to retain (or gain) market share in an increasingly saturated market place.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |